Home / The Existence of God / Reassessing Plantinga’s Ontological Argument for God Reassessing Plantinga’s Ontological Argument for God. And remember, Plantinga’s argument is that we only need to show evil is not logically inconsistent with God’s existence to defeat the logical problem of evil. 107 Comments. Plantinga developed his modal version of the ontological argument for the existence of God in his two controversial books, The Nature of Necessity [1974: ch. Here, Plantinga attempted to use the philosophical concept of possible worlds to show the necessary nature of God's existence. Plantinga has also developed a more comprehensive epistemological account of the nature of warrant which allows for the existence of God as a basic belief. Specifically, Plantinga argues that free will provides a logically possible reason for an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good God to allow the existence of moral evil. 10] and God, Freedom and Evil [1975: part 2 c]. Plantinga’s book is a semi-popular treatment of the conflicts, real or perceived, between science and religion, broadly construed. In Plantinga’s view, a fallible person who is morally incapable of sin is a being without Unlike the logical problem of evil, the evidential problem of evil can allow that God’s existence is possible. Plantinga has also argued that there is no logical inconsistency between the existence of evil and the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, wholly good God. Dark Souls 3 Black Knight Sword Location, History Of The Word Happiness, French Grammar Exercises For Beginners, How To Drink Limoncello In Italy, C Mixolydian Chords Guitar, Ap Calculus Ab Review, Zl37 Came Manual, " />
Nov 28

Alvin Plantinga's Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. The evidential problem of evil. Both agreed that there is some sort of sense of God, an ability to discover God that precedes our reason. [1975: part 2 c]. Since Leibniz first coined the term, ‘possible world’, in the seventeenth century, it has gained widespread attention. God’s omnipotence does not imply logical contradiction, such as making a square circle. Baird: "Immediately after stating that there is a possible world in which God exists, Plantinga makes a revision of this statement. by Dr. Edward Feser Filed under The Existence of God. Here, Plantinga attempted to use the philosophical concept of possible worlds to show the necessary nature of God’s existence. 2) Possible Beings. Plantinga argues for the existence of a sensus divinitatis by utilizing the theology of both Aquinas and Calvin. But if God's existence is at least logically possible (i.e., the concept of God's existence is not a concept like "round square"), then there is a possible world in which God exists." Alvin Plantinga famously defends a version of the ontological argument that makes use of the notion of possible worlds. Browse > Home / The Existence of God / Reassessing Plantinga’s Ontological Argument for God Reassessing Plantinga’s Ontological Argument for God. And remember, Plantinga’s argument is that we only need to show evil is not logically inconsistent with God’s existence to defeat the logical problem of evil. 107 Comments. Plantinga developed his modal version of the ontological argument for the existence of God in his two controversial books, The Nature of Necessity [1974: ch. Here, Plantinga attempted to use the philosophical concept of possible worlds to show the necessary nature of God's existence. Plantinga has also developed a more comprehensive epistemological account of the nature of warrant which allows for the existence of God as a basic belief. Specifically, Plantinga argues that free will provides a logically possible reason for an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good God to allow the existence of moral evil. 10] and God, Freedom and Evil [1975: part 2 c]. Plantinga’s book is a semi-popular treatment of the conflicts, real or perceived, between science and religion, broadly construed. In Plantinga’s view, a fallible person who is morally incapable of sin is a being without Unlike the logical problem of evil, the evidential problem of evil can allow that God’s existence is possible. Plantinga has also argued that there is no logical inconsistency between the existence of evil and the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, wholly good God.

Dark Souls 3 Black Knight Sword Location, History Of The Word Happiness, French Grammar Exercises For Beginners, How To Drink Limoncello In Italy, C Mixolydian Chords Guitar, Ap Calculus Ab Review, Zl37 Came Manual,

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis

Comments are closed.