Mango Joe's Seaworld Menu, Sim Racing Wheel Rims, Canned Salmon Recipes With Rice, Grandia Best Magic Justin, Chinese Food Elk Grove, Ri State Beaches, Obs Display Capture Black Screen, West Englewood Chicago Crime, Mickey Mouse Svg, C Jam Blues Real Book, Gabriele Marcotti Net Worth, " />
Nov 28

Others say that banning patenting actually protects the public investment into genome research, which could become wasted if private companies stifle attempts to research into genes on which they hold a … If a company were able to claim ownership on a gene, it could prevent other, better companies from using this information to develop cures or treatments for diseases. Should genetically engineered seeds be patented? Here is a summary of the event, including video podcasts. It takes years to develop a well-functioning product, and companies rely on patents to recover the heavy investment made in R&D. Genes are a part of the human body, and companies should not be permitted to hold a patent on them. Others disagree and don’t believe gene sequences should be patentable. Report Post. As we all know, private companies and universities are vying to obtain patents for genes since the Human Genome Project. Troubled by the way this law both harmed patients and created a barrier to biomedical innovation, Tania Simoncelli and her colleagues at the ACLU challenged it. Some believe that genes, which are the building blocks of human life, should not be considered as "products" to be patented or marketed because it shows a blatant disregard for humanity. More details about the event are on the ipria website.If you have comments or thoughts to share about the discussion, please add them to the “comments” section at the end of the page. Companies should not be allowed to patent genes. And they cannot be acquired without ownership. In April, 2009, IPRIA and CITE organized a panel debate and public discussion on “should genes be patented?”. Although lower courts have heard cases involving gene patents (see below), the Supreme Court has yet to weigh in. When genes are owned their benefits, characteristics, triggers et cetera can be exploited for the benefit of mankind. A decade ago, US law said human genes were patentable -- which meant patent holders had the right to stop anyone from sequencing, testing or even looking at a patented gene. It is better for everyone if the body is free from patents. Although genes are certainly natural phenomena, some believe the act of isolating and studying them makes them patentable under the Chakrabarty ruling. I would like to know whether you support or oppose the patenting of genes and the reason for supporting or opposing it. Genes should be patented because while they are studied only after they have been acquired.

Mango Joe's Seaworld Menu, Sim Racing Wheel Rims, Canned Salmon Recipes With Rice, Grandia Best Magic Justin, Chinese Food Elk Grove, Ri State Beaches, Obs Display Capture Black Screen, West Englewood Chicago Crime, Mickey Mouse Svg, C Jam Blues Real Book, Gabriele Marcotti Net Worth,

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis

Comments are closed.